Legal Opinion
Gill v. De Sanz
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1975No. Docket Nos. 44223, 44787PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
These consolidated appeals involve the attachment of California assets of three Mexican corporations, not qualified to do business in California, who are among the defendants below. In 2d Civil No. 44223, the corporations appeal from a trial court order refusing to release and discharge an attachment before they had made a general appearance in the action. In 2d Civil No. 44787, plaintiff appeals from a trial court order granting such a motion after the defendants’ general appearance.
Facts
Before the present action was filed, plaintiff Gill was appointed receiver of Ti-Cal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Adams v. EgleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1972
- Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. National Health Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Shaw, Hooker & Co. v. HaismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Shaw, Hooker & Co. v. HaismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976