Legal Opinion

Shaw, Hooker & Co. v. Haisman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1976No. Civ. 37605Published

1Opinion of the Court

59 Cal.App.3d 262 (1976)

130 Cal. Rptr. 528

SHAW, HOOKER & COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ROBERT L. HAISMAN, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. 37605.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

June 18, 1976.

COUNSEL

Layman & Lempert and Arthur J. Lempert for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Howard S. Burnside for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BRAY, J.[*]

Plaintiff appeals from the order of the San Francisco Superior Court granting defendant's motion to quash the writ of attachment.

ISSUE PRESENTED

Respondent was not engaged in a trade or business and hence the trial court properly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Washburn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API