Hale Bros. v. Milliken
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Motion to discharge the writ of attachment issued in the cause. It appears from the complaint that plaintiff leased a piece of land in San Francisco with a view to erecting a building thereon in which to conduct its business; in January, 1900, plaintiff began negotiations with defendants for the necessary structural steel required for the building, and defendants submitted two lists of prices—one for delivery in February, 1900, and the other for May delivery, the former calling for a higher price than the latter; that plaintiff informed defendant at this time that it had leased the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Gaylord Manufacturing Co. v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Studer v. . BleisteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. HimmelbauerMontana Supreme Court · 1919
- Hoffman v. Pacific Coast Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.