Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Respondents instituted a garnishment action against petitioner as defendant and Miller Harris Instrument Co., her employer, as garnishee. The complaint alleged *338a claim of $420 on a promissory note. The garnishee filed its answer stating it had wages of $63.18 under its control earned .by petitioner and unpaid, and that it would pay one-half to petitioner as a subsistence allowance1 and hold the other half subject to the order of the court.
Petitioner moved that the garnishment proceedings be dismissed for failure to satisfy the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,781 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
1,776 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.