Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
William H. Haupt and Charles W. Cradick for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
There are here involved two proceedings by which the petitioner seeks to prohibit the superior court from, dissolving an attachment in a ease pending in Los Angeles County, entitled Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Albert I. Holland et al. The allegations of the complaint in that case are to the effect that the defendants conspired and confederated together for the purpose of converting goods, wares, drugs and merchandise belonging to the plaintiff to their own use and benefit; that in pursuance thereof they did convert drugs, goods, wares and merchandise owned by the plaintiff to their own use and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bechtel v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fink v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.