Murphy v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem. *
In 1950, plaintiff A. L. Murphy contracted with the United States Reclamation Bureau to construct a diversion dam on the Pecos River, near Port Sumner in New Mexico.
Unfortunately Mr. Murphy did not have enough capital to carry on his contract. He had increasing trouble financing the work. He had underestimated the cost of labor, and his bid was too low. On the trial of this action, one of the witnesses said that he left all of his profits on the desk when he picked up his contract. He had difficulty with his bonding company. And he finally got into such desperate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Calimpco, Inc. v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Taylor v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Mears v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kane v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Beverly Finance Co. v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969