Legal Opinion
Mears v. Crocker First National Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1948No. Civ. 13478PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, J. pro tem.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the action after the trial court had sustained the demurrer of defendant Crocker First National Bank of San Francisco without leave to amend. Defendant I.X.L. Mining . Company is a foreign corporation, was not served with summons and was not before the court.
The amended complaint after first alleging the corporate existence of both defendants reads as follows: “That on February 15th, 1946 plaintiff was the owner and holder and entitled to the possession of 20,000 shares of the common stock of defendant I.X.L. Mining Company, which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Payne v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Ralston v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- PMC, Inc. v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Igauye v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kessinger v. Organic Fertilizers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Dwyer v. Lanan & Snow Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Mears v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.