Legal Opinion
Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 2003No. G030196PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Twin Laboratories, Inc., manufactures and markets nutritional and dietary supplements, some of which contain ma huang, a botanical source of ephedra alkaloids. General Nutrition Corporation (GNC) and its franchisees sell these products.
James Nagel, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated (collectively Nagel), sued Twin Laboratories, Inc. (apparently incorrectly named *43in the complaint as Twin Lab Corporation), GNC, and certain GNC franchisees for violations of California’s unfair competition laws and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. (For ease of reference, we…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Martinez v. Metabolife International., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.