Legal Opinion
Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 2003No. G030196PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
134 Cal.Rptr.2d 420 (2003)
139 Cal.App.4th 39
James NAGEL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
TWIN LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. G030196.
Court of Appeal, Fourth District.
May 22, 2003.
Leck & Associates, Robert B. Leek III, Bette A. Baker; Ulmer & Berne, Joseph P. Thomas and Rex A. Littrell for Defendants and Appellants.
Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson, Sharon J. Arkin, Newport Beach; Andrews & Thornton, Anne Andrews and John C. Thornton, Long Beach, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
OPINION
FYBEL, J.
Twin Laboratories, Inc., manufactures and markets nutritional and dietary…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Martinez v. Metabolife International., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.