Shirran v. Dallas
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an interlocutory decree in partition of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County and from- an order refusing a new trial. L. W. F'ulkerth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action for the partition of the lands described in the complaint. The court found that the property affected by its decree was so situated that partition thereof could not be had without "great prejudice" to the owners of the same, and, accordingly, decreed a sale thereof by a referee appointed by the court for that purpose, such sale or sales to be subject to the confirmation of the court and the proceeds thereof to be paid by said referee into court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Miller v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.