Legal Opinion

Hibberd v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1885No. 7275PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the late District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, and from an order of the Superior ■Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The opinion heretofore delivered in the above case is hereby approved and adopted by the.court on rehearing, with the addition thereto of the following authorities: Welsh v. Sackett et al. 12 Wis. 243; Kingsbury v. Burnside, 58 Ill. 310; Comme v. Jackson, 10 Bush, 424; Budd v. Hays, 11 Ky. 34; Palmelee v. Simpson, 5 Wall. 81.)

Judgment and order affirmed;

McKee, J., expressed no opinion; Sharpstein, J., being disqualified, did not participate in the decision.

The following opinion above referred, to was delivered in Bank on the 30th of July, 1884:—

Thornton, J. This action in our ordina…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Landes v. BrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Jackson ex dem. Griswold v. BardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  4. Kingsbury v. BurnsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Church v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1836

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API