Legal Opinion

McGee v. Allen

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1936No. L. A. 15214PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The above entitled three actions were jointly tried, but separate findings and judgments were entered in each case. All three actions concern the same property, consisting of a ranch in Santa Barbara County, which constituted a part of the residue of the estate of La Torre Webster on his death on August 27, 1928. Leland J. Allen, a defendant in all three actions, appeals from judgments which decreed that he had no right, title or interest in said property.

By his will La Torre Webster bequeathed to his son, T. Dean Webster, an undivided one-fourth interest in the residue of his estate, and to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In Re Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API