Legal Opinion

Martinovich v. Marsicano

California Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1902No. S.F. No. 2918PublishedCited by 64 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action to quiet title. Saverio Martinovich died February 6, 1889, seised of certain real estate in San Francisco and elsewhere, leaving him surviving his widow, Sophia Martinovich, and a son, the plaintiff herein, to whom by his last will and testament he devised his property. The will was admitted to probate and letters testamentary issued to the widow, who was appointed therein as his executrix. A petition for final distribution of the estate was filed October 22,1897, and on March 30,1898, a decree was entered, in which, after reciting that “the said Sophia, widow of the said deceased, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hardy v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API