Miller v. Oliver
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was to quiet title, and the court below sustained a general demurrer to the complaint, interposed by J. E. Oliver, "as administrator, etc., and dismissed the action as to all the defendants. Prom this judgment of dismissal the plaintiff appeals.
The allegations of the complaint are substantially as follows : That on the twenty-seventh day of March, 1892, Charles Sperry was the owner of the real property involved, and on or about that date died testate; that thereafter his will was admitted to probate, and thereafter, after proper notice given and proceedings had, a decree of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nelson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Byrnes v. . StilwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Stokes v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Randall v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Brown v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.