Legal Opinion
Remillard v. Remillard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 13, 2010No. SC 18485PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Sharon Remillard, appeals 1 from the trial court’s denial of her postdissolution motion to terminate her obligation to pay alimony to the defendant, Bradford Remillard, on the basis of the defendant’s cohabitation with an unrelated female. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to apply the criteria set forth in General Statutes § 46b-86 (b) 2 in determining whether to terminate the plaintiffs alimony obligation, and (2) interpreted the term “cohabitation,” as used in the parties’ separation agreement, as requiring proof of a romantic…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. HolnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Murtha v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Cohen v. ROLL-A-COVER, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- AMERICAN DIAMOND EXCHANGE, INC. v. AlpertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. ChyungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. Miss Porter's SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.