Legal Opinion
National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-271PublishedCited by 771 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The University of Oklahoma and the University of Georgia contend that the National Collegiate Athletic Association has unreasonably restrained trade in the televising of college football games. After an extended trial, the District Court found that the NCAA had violated § 1 of the Sherman Act1 and granted injunctive relief. 546 F. Supp. 1276 (WD Okla. 1982). The Court of Appeals agreed that the statute had been violated but modified the remedy in some respects. 707 F. 2d 1147 (CA10 1983). We granted certiorari, 464 U. S. 913 (1983), and now affirm.
I
The NCAA
Since its inception in 1905, the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by771 opinions
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
766 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.