Legal Opinion

Geysen v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 9, 2016No. SC19545PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, C.J.

This consolidated appeal 1 presents the question of whether an at-will employment agreement, providing that an employee's commissions will not be paid unless the employer has invoiced commissionable amounts to the client prior to the employee's termination, is contrary to public policy and a violation of General Statutes (Supp.2016) § 31-72. 2 The defendant, Securitas Security Services, USA, Inc., appeals from the stipulated judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Kevin Geysen, on his wage statute claim and the trial court's underlying ruling holding that this commission…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. GWG DLP Funding V, LLC v. PHL Variable Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. Sepega v. DeLaura ConcurrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. Nwachukwu v. Liberty BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
  4. Jane Doe v. CochranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  5. Emeritus Senior Living v. LeporeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API