Legal Opinion

Austin v. Burroughs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

• Champlin, J.

• In 1883 the defendant was the agent of Hoover & Gamble for the sale of- their 'Excelsior reapers, harvesters,-and self-binders; also the William "Anson 'Wood mowing-machines. He was also engaged in selling ■agricultural implements. . '

In May of that year, as plaintiff claims, he. entered-into-an agreement with the defendant to sell goods, of the.,classes above described, for him on a commission. In this: agreement it was specified at what prices the articles should be sold, and the commissions plaintiff w¡as to receive on such sales. ' ......[

Plaintiff claims that soon after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Manhard v. SchottMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wright v. Estate of TreichelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Daines v. TarabusiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API