Austin v. Burroughs
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
• Champlin, J.
• In 1883 the defendant was the agent of Hoover & Gamble for the sale of- their 'Excelsior reapers, harvesters,-and self-binders; also the William "Anson 'Wood mowing-machines. He was also engaged in selling ■agricultural implements. . '
In May of that year, as plaintiff claims, he. entered-into-an agreement with the defendant to sell goods, of the.,classes above described, for him on a commission. In this: agreement it was specified at what prices the articles should be sold, and the commissions plaintiff w¡as to receive on such sales. ' ......[
Plaintiff claims that soon after…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Manhard v. SchottMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Wright v. Estate of TreichelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Daines v. TarabusiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.