Legal Opinion

Manhard v. Schott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1877PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Marquette. Attachment. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In this case an attachment suit was brought before a justice in Marquette county, by plaintiff *235against defendants, but no property was found, and no personal service was had on any of the defendants; but substituted service was made on one of them, Nathan Schott, by leaving a copy of the writ at his last place of residence. The writ was returnable on the 18th of November, 1875, and the return was made on the 12th. The case was adjourned until December 20, at which time plaintiff declared. All the defendants appeared specially by attorney and moved to quash the proceedings for various defects…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crane v. HardyMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Johnson v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Dalton v. LaudahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Pardee v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. McGraw v. SturgeonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Improved-Match Co. v. Michigan Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dailey v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Steel v. Clinton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Taylor v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Isabelle v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API