Legal Opinion

Daines v. Tarabusi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 94, Calendar No. 34,088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Wiest, J.

Plaintiffs declared defendant’s rights under a land contract forfeited, for default in payment, and commenced a summary proceeding before a circuit court commissioner to obtain possession of the land. Before the commissioner defendant, by attorney, appeared specially and objected to the jurisdiction of his person under substituted service of process, claiming the order authorizing publication was void. The commissioner determined that plaintiffs were entitled to have restitution of the premises and found the amount due under the contract. Defendant took a general appeal to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gunn Hardware Co. v. DenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Austin v. BurroughsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. National Coal Co. v. Cincinnati Gas Coke, Coal & Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Young v. Reeves & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gotfredson Land Co. v. ShevitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Nelson v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API