Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Ashley
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
In the fall of 1919, the defendant began proceedings for deepening and widening what is known as “Mud Lake drain,” which traverses a part of Bangor and Hartford townships in Van Burén county. Some of the landowners declined to release a claim for damages and an application for the appointment of commissioners was filed in the probate court pursuant to 1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 4883. In this application the “P. M. R. R. Co.” was named as one of such owners and the parcel of land alleged to be owned by it. specifically described. A citation was issued, addressed to such owners, in which the “P. M.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Dailey v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Graham v. Cass Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Lyon v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Fisher v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re Fitch Drain No. 129Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Walters v. Dock CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1928