Dunlap v. Byers
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Huron; Beach, J. Bill by Jeptha D. Dunlap and others to enjoin William J. Byers and others from prosecuting certain suits in ejectment. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
In 1873 James Dunlap, through whom 'the complainants claim, and William J. Byers, through whom defendants claim, were engaged in the business of buying and selling lumber in Cincinnati as partners, -under the firm name of James Dunlap & Co. In addition to the property they held as partners, they acquired title to an undivided two-thirds of certain lands in Huron county, this State; some of the lands being held in the name of Dunlap alone, and some of them being held in the names of Dunlap and Byers. Afterwards complainant Lucius P. Mason, who owned ■an undivided one-third oj the lands,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mitchell v. BunchNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Shanks v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Moran v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Godfrey v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Rammelsberg v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 1875
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Lyle Cashion Company v. McKendrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Rozan v. RozanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Rickman v. RickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.