Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Margolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 1997No. C8-96-2058PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Dean Milton Margolis in response to complaints about his treatment of two clients. See Rule 12(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The disciplinary petition alleged that Margolis forged a purported client’s signature on a retainer agreement, attempted to settle a case against another client’s egress wishes, and then attempted to cover up his wrongdoing in both eases by lying and fabricating evidence in violation of the Minnesota Rules of…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against JagielaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Matter of Discipline of JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ZotaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Roraff v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EdingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MoellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HanvikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API