Roraff v. State, Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Commission may award attorneys’ fees in a proceeding brought to recover medical expenses under Minn.Stat. § 176.135 (1978). A careful reading of Minn.Stat. §§ 176.135 and 176.-081 (1978) shows that the latter was intended to govern awards of attorneys’ fees in proceedings in which an employee is awarded disability compensation, but was not meant to apply to awards of attorneys’ fees in proceedings brought solely to recover medical expenses. The authority to assess the costs of the latter proceeding, including…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Repo v. CAPITOL ELEVATOR CO., DIV. OF IMCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Irwin v. Surdyk's LiquorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Johnson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against MargolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Donald D. David v. Bartel Enterprises (Nitro Green), Relator, and SFM Mutual Insurance Company, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.