Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Hanvik

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 2000No. C3-99-815PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent James T. Hanvik on May 19, 1999. Han-vik responded on May 25, 1999, admitting most of the allegations in the petition. A hearing was held on August 20, 1999, where Hanvik presented mitigation evidence and evidence as to the few contested factual matters. The referee filed his Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendations for Discipline on September 30, 1999, in which he rejected Hanvik’s mitigation claims of psychological disorder, remorse, pro bono…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LaChapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API