Legal Opinion

Vait v. Merillat Industries

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1988No. C2-88-1376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming a compensation judge’s determination that Minn.Stat. § 176.102, subd. 9 (1986) does not require the self-insured employer to pay for reasonable costs of travel and custodial daycare while the employee participated in an on-the-job training program. We reverse.

The parties in this case have submitted the following stipulated facts:

“Cathy Vait sustained an injury to her right elbow on July 11, 1985, in the course and scope of her employment as an assembler for the self-insured employer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gale v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Morrison v. Merrick's Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Gasper v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Graves v. Glen Lake State SanitoriumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API