Vait v. Merillat Industries
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming a compensation judge’s determination that Minn.Stat. § 176.102, subd. 9 (1986) does not require the self-insured employer to pay for reasonable costs of travel and custodial daycare while the employee participated in an on-the-job training program. We reverse.
The parties in this case have submitted the following stipulated facts:
“Cathy Vait sustained an injury to her right elbow on July 11, 1985, in the course and scope of her employment as an assembler for the self-insured employer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gale v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Morrison v. Merrick's Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Gasper v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Graves v. Glen Lake State SanitoriumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992