Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Bartley-Lindsay Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1995No. C6-94-871, C1-94-1927 and C0-94-2261PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

The employees in these three cases challenge the validity of durational limitations on medical treatment contained in the Emergency Rules Relating to Workers’ Compensation Treatment Parameters.

Ronald Hirsch sustained a compensable low back injury on June 23,1989, while working for Bartley-Lindsay Company, then insured for workers’ compensation liability by Aetna Life & Casualty Company. Hirsch initially sought chiropractic care; but in March 1990, the chiropractor referred Hirsch to an orthopedic surgeon who recommended fusion surgery. Aetna refused to authorize…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of SebekaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Eberle v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Castle v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Billion v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Pelowski v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API