Legal Opinion

Rippentrop v. Imperial Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1982No. 81-334, 81-336PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Employee Richard Rippentrop and the commissioner of labor and industry separately seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals which construed Minn.Stat. § 176.102 (1980) as (1) not entitling a disabled employee seeking direct job placement in a new occupation to receive compensation at the rate of 125% of his temporary total disability benefits pursuant to section 176.102, subd. 11, and (2) as not authorizing the director of rehabilitation services and the rehabilitation review panel established by that statute to determine when disabled employees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Contest of General ElectionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Nelson v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leahy v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Langa v. Fleischmann-Kurth Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Sherman v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Solberg v. FMC Corp., Northern Ordinance DivisionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Kurrell v. National Con Rod, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API