Legal Opinion
Spicer v. Spicer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 7, 1993No. 12081PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from an order entered pursuant to General Statutes § 52-410,1 grant*154ing the plaintiffs application to compel the defendant to proceed with arbitration. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. The defendant and the plaintiffs decedent were brothers and had, for a number of years, operated various businesses in the areas of Groton and Noank through a partnership and a corporation. On November 30,1983, the defendant and the plaintiffs decedent executed a buy-sell agreement setting forth a method for the resolution of their…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Associated Catalog Merchandisers, Inc. v. ChagnonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. HarveyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Capp Industries, Inc. v. SchoenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. Hoa Van NguyenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Green v. Connecticut Disposal Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Lussier v. SpinnatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.