Legal Opinion
Harris Calorific Sales Co. v. Manifold Systems, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 6, 1989No. 6921PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacobson, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering it to pay the plaintiff a specified amount under a contract between the parties. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that an agreement made by the parties on September 11, 1984, had modified an earlier contract executed by them on December 10, 1982, (2) in finding that the plaintiff had received the defendant’s *561consent, as required in the earlier agreement, to transact business with a customer with whom the plaintiff was prohibited to deal under the terms of a noncompe-tition clause in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Prime Management Company, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. John F. Steinegger and Nancy J. Steinegger, D/B/A Franz Melzer Associates, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Paulus v. LaSalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.