Massachusetts Fire & Marine Insurance v. Cagle
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sole question presented by this appeal is whether a policy of insurance issued by appellant to appellees covered loss suffered by appellees by reason of a swindle, perpetrated on appellee Cagle, by which Cagle lost a 1946 Ford Tudor Sedan. Appellees sought judgment against appellant on the ground that the transaction between appellee Cagle and one George S. English (alias Yeargan), under which the car was obtained from Cagle by English (or Yeargan), amounted to a theft. The defense of appellant was that the language of the policy excluded liability for the loss.
The lower court sitting as a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Nugent v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Central Surety Fire Corporation v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- Almadova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Galloway v. Marathon InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Picornell v. Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of P.R. Inc.Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 1995
- Pridgen v. Bill Terry's Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966