Legal Opinion
Central Surety Fire Corporation v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 7, 1948No. 4-8550PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
The extent of coverage of the insurance policy is the question presented.
On November 7,1946, appellant issued a policy which protected appellee Williams to the extent of $1,750 against the loss of his Chrysler automobile by “theft, larceny, robbery or pilferage”; and the policy was in force at all times hereinafter mentioned. On December 26, 1946, a man calling himself George F. Martin approached Williams, seeking to buy the Chrysler automobile. The conversations began about 1:30 p. m. About 3:30 p. m. (which was after banking hours), Martin agreed to pay Williams…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Abrams v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boggs v. Motors Insurance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Rudolph v. Home Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Sullivant v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. DenhardtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.