Legal Opinion
Nugent v. Union Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1932PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
On March 22, 1928, the plaintiffs, then residents of Portland, Oregon, insured their automobile with the defendant company for a period of twelve months, against actual damage and loss, for an amount not to exceed the actual cash value of the same at the time of the loss. That particular section of the policy that is pertinent to this case is as follows:
“(B) THEFT, ROBBERY OR PILFERAGE by persons excepting those in the employment, service or household of the Assured, and excepting also the wrongful conversion or secretion by a bailee or mortgager or vendee in possession under mortgage,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. IankovetzOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Fiske v. Niagara Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Downs v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Clark Motor Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Larson Construction Company, an Oregon Corporation, and R. C. Larson v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Co., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Keegan v. LenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Plummer v. KingsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.