Granger v. New Jersey Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action on an automobile insurance policy. The policy was issued by defendant company for the benefit of plaintiff and other beneficiaries named therein. It was one in the form universally in use by automobile dealers who insert in their policies for convenience the names of different finance companies or concerns through which they do their financing. The policy, among other things, insured the beneficiaries named therein against theft, robbery or pilferage, except by any person in the assured’s household or in their service or employ, and excepting also the wrongful conversion, embezzlement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- People v. SalorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hill v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Ledvinka v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Munchick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Firemans Fund Ins. Co. of San Francisco v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.