Legal Opinion

Hill v. North River Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1922No. 23,531PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Oliver P. Puller; judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The question in this case is whether the holder of an insurance policy “against theft, robbery or pilferage” of his automobile may recover on such policy in a case where he was deprived of his car by a preconceived scheme of impersonation, misrepresentation and fraud. The facts were as follows:

A reputable mechanic in Arkansas City named Ben Cole, who was a member of the Boilermakers’ Union, employed by the Santa Fe railway, and who had money in the bank, was robbed of his union card and bank check book by a rogue named Montgomery who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LawlessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Mitchell Grain & Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Tredwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
  4. Delafield v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Tripp v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Royal Insurance v. JackOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Boggs v. Motors Insurance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API