Legal Opinion
Almadova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1982No. 15841PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
Appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), appeals a decision of the trial court which granted the motion for summary judgment filed by appellees, Ronald and Georgia Al-madova (Almadova), on an insurance claim Almadova had brought against State Farm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
FACTS
State Farm had insured Almadova’s 1976 Porsche automobile by a policy which contained theft coverage. On September 11, 1979, Almadova agreed to sell the car to the Fairchild Car Company, which at that time…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Munchick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Firemans Fund Ins. Co. of San Francisco v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Toms v. Hartford Fire Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Crunk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Mann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Greenfield v. Western Heritage Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.