Heidner v. Hewitt Chevrolet Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cowan, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment denying specific performance in a case involving the purchase of an automobile. The facts have been found by the district court and no exceptions taken thereto by either party. This court, on appeal, is bound by the findings of fact but not by the conclusions of law.
From the findings of the trial court the following facts are estab*12lished: On January 8, 1946, the plaintiff below deposited, with defendant company at Ottawa, Kan., $100 on a new car and received a receipt reading as follows:
“Hewitt Chevrolet…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Sandefur v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Zelleken v. LynchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Redinger v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Marsh v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Gardner v. SpurlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- DeBauge Bros., Inc. v. WhitsittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Russell v. FerrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.