Legal Opinion

Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1938No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Linn,

Plaintiffs’ bill for specific performance of a contract to convey land was dismissed on preliminary objections, based (1) on “lack of mutuality of both obligation and remedy between the parties” and (2) absence of tender of performance. The learned judge said the case “falls squarely within the facts in the case of Elder v. Robinson, 19 Pa. 364—and is governed by the principle” (quoted from that case) “where a lessor stipulated with his lessee, in the lease, that when the land was offered for sale, the first offer shall be made to the lessee upon terms as favorable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Kerr v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  3. Klauder v. CregarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Peoples Street Ry. Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Burford v. PoundersTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Wyoming National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API