Legal Opinion

Zelleken v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1909No. 16,157PublishedCited by 24 opinions

■ Error from Cherokee district court; S. C. Westcott, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiffs, Lynch & Co., brought an' ■action against the defendants, the Dillon company, to ■compel the performance of an oral agreement to make a lease of mineral land for mining purposes, and was' successful. A demurrer to the petition was • oyerruled, and it is claimed here that the petition states no cause ■of action for specific performance because of a lack of mutuality in the obligation and remedy of the parties.

The petition charges that in consideration of the payment of a certain royalty on the ore to bé mined the ■defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hollis v. BurgessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Topeka Water-Supply Co. v. RootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. Bacon v. LeslieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Wilbourn v. BishopMississippi Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fleischer v. James Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  2. Bonanza, Inc. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Wiles v. WilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Solberg v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API