Legal Opinion

Sandefur v. Hines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1904No. 13,600PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was brought by J. T. Sandefur to recover from H. H. Hines the sum of $500 as commission for procuring a purchaser for certain real estate of Hines’s in Coffeyville. Defendant denied that Sandefur was his agent or that he had been employed to sell the land, and when plaintiff had rested the trial court sustained a demurrer to his evidence.

*169The only question presented here is, Did the testimony, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, tend to show his employment by the defendant to find a purchaser for the real…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Tabler, Crudup & Co. v. Sheffield Land, Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Wyatt v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hiniger v. JudySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Braniff v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Stanton v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Powers v. BohuslavNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Grimes v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API