Legal Opinion
Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 14, 1970No. C-70 2253PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge.
This action was commenced in the Superior Court in Alameda County, California, by the Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Kaiser Trading Company [hereinafter referred to collectively as “Kaiser”], 1 against the Associated Metals & Minerals Corporation [hereinafter referred to as “Associated”] for breach of contract. Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction, specific performance, and money damages. The suit was removed to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. The relevant facts are as follows:
The Kaiser…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Immigrant Assistance Project Of The Los Angeles County Federation Of Labor v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sullivan Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1990
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
- Al Bishop Agency, Inc. v. Lithonia-Division of National Service Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979
- Sims Snowboards, Inc., a California Corporation v. Craig Kelly and the Burton Corp., a Vermont Corporation Dba Burton SnowboardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.