Austin v. Ash
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Plaintiffs had a large students’ rooming house at Ann Arbor which they were buying on land contract. Defendant leased it of them for a period of years. She owned property in Florida and negotiations were opened between them for an exchange of properties. We are satisfied defendant represented that she had a clear title to the Florida property and that no one but herself had any interest in or claim on it. Before the deal was "closed Mr. Austin made a trip to see the Florida property, defendant paying one-half the expense; he found no one in possession of the property or claiming any interest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. DickMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Mulheron v. Henry S. Koppin Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Patten v. DownerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Gerycz v. ZagalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Scadin v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berkeley Bank for Cooperatives v. MeibosUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Rood v. Midwest Matrix Mart, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Schupp v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Geel v. ValiquettMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.