Legal Opinion

Patten v. Downer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1924No. Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am unable to agree with the conclusions reached by my Brother BIRD in this case. As to defendant Ives, the most that is claimed by plaintiff is that he was a broker assisting in making the sale. I do not think the proof sustains this claim; but if we assume, in the absence of a request for a directed verdict as to him, that such was his interest, the instruction complained of was erroneous as to him. There was no testimony that would justify the jury in finding a conspiracy between him and defendant Downer to defraud plaintiff, no testimony that he profited in any way by the transaction or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Steele v. BanningaMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Johnson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jackson v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Williamson v. HannanMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tyler v. BurgesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Austin v. AshMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Toner v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API