Scadin v. Sherwood
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Bill to rescind a contract for an exchange of land. Complainants appeal from decree dismissing bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The bill is filed in this case to rescind a contract for an exchange of land. The cause was heard in the court below upon pleadings and proofs, and the bill of complaint dismissed. Complainants appeal.
On August 7, 1885, and prior thereto, Peter C. Scadin was the owner of lot 130 of Leonard & Co.’s addition to the city of Grand Rapids, Michigan. There was a dwelling-house situated thereon, in which Scadin and his wife, Emily M., resided* *231It was their homestead, and of the value of $1,500, and unincumbered.
Shortly prior to the day last mentioned, defendant William E. Sherwood proposed to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Austin v. AshMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Saba v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1950