Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Dick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1897PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Haire, J., presiding. Bill by the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company against Elizabeth Dick for the cancellation of a policy on the life of one John J. Dick, and for an injunction against the prosecution of an action at law thereon. From an order overruling her demurrer to the bill, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainant’s bill alleges that:

1. The complainant issued a life policy of $2,000 on the life of John J. Dick, payable to the defendant, wherein it was stipulated that, if any installment should not be paid when due, the policy should be void, except as to its paid-up value. The company was accustomed to accept past-due installments, and to reinstate the policy, provided the insured would furnish a proper certificate of good health; said certificate stating further that the insured agrees that the payment is received and policy reinstated on condition of the truth of such certificate.

2.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Teft v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Shaw v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Bay City Bridge Co. v. Van EttenMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Aetna Life Ins. v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ebner v. Ohio State Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Mactavish v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. PropstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API