San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. Abraham
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing in this matter was granted by this court for the purpose of giving further consideration to certain contentions urged by appellant-petitioner as to the soundness of the conclusion arrived at by the District Court of Appeal. Such investigation leads us to the conclusion that the trial court did not abuse or misuse its power by discharging the attachment and that the appellate court’s decision as to the law of the case may well be affirmed. The opinion of Mr. Justice Sturtevant, Division Two, First Appellate District, with the noted correction as to the order of the counts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bechtel v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Falkinburg v. LucyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Hiller v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Stowe v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.