Bechtel v. Chase
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William F. Palmer, Luke D. Bechtel, and Palmer & Mahan, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought against the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Charles D. Foster, deceased, to recover from said estate the sum of $7550 principal and interest thereon from January 1, 1904, at the rate of six per cent per annum.
The complaint states plaintiff’s case in three counts or causes of action. While these vary somewhat in phraseology, all are based upon the same transaction. The first is- in the form of a common count, alleging that the estate of Charles D. Foster, deceased, is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $7550, with interest from the first day of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.