Falkinburg v. Lucy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, J.:
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged invasion of the plaintiffs’ right of property in a-certain trademark, and to restrain the defendants by injunction from further use or imitation. Upon the filing of the complaint an injunction was issued and served, and thereupon the defendants filed their answer and moved to dissolve the injunction upon the complaint 'and the answer, with the exhibits thereto respectively attached.
At the hearing the plaintiffs offered to read an affidavit made by one of them in contradiction of certain matters contained in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Town of East Hartford v. HartFord Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Fetridge v. WellsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Stokes v. LandgraffNew York Supreme Court · 1853
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Vidal v. ElsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Choynski v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Shaver v. ShaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. MosesianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.