Willett & Burr v. Alpert
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, discharging writs of attachment. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
Under stipulation two. separate appeals from two orders, one discharging an attachment as to the defendant Alpert, the other discharging the writ in the same action as to defendant Gordon, are considered together.
The plaintiff corporation brought an action to recover damages against the defendants, Alpert, Brownstone, and Gordon, in the total sum of $6,562.50. At the time of filing the complaint the plaintiff also filed an undertaking on attachment. The affidavit is in the usual form and alleges that the plaintiff is a corporation, and that each of the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. TuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.