Legal Opinion

DeSciose v. Chiles, Heider & Co., Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1991No. 88-856PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case involves only the question of the statute of limitations as applied to plaintiff’s action against defendants. Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-221 (Reissue 1989), the issue of the applicability of the statute of limitations to plaintiff’s action was tried separately. Apparently, the parties and the trial court agreed that the issue should be tried to a jury. After trial, the jury answered certain questions submitted to it, and the court ordered certain parts of plaintiff’s claims against defendants dismissed and retained one particular claim for trial. Plaintiff has appealed to this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  2. Charles Hughes & Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. League v. VaniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Norris & Hirshberg, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  5. Sikyta v. Arrow Stage Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Broekemeier Ford, Inc. v. ClatanoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cody v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Upah v. Ancona Bros. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Christianson v. Educational Service Unit No. 16Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dinsmore v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API